Review



nir fluorescence signals  (Kodak)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Kodak nir fluorescence signals
    Nir Fluorescence Signals, supplied by Kodak, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nir fluorescence signals/product/Kodak
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nir fluorescence signals - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    nir fluorescence signal  (LI-COR)
    99
    LI-COR nir fluorescence signal
    FIGURE 5. Athymic mice bearing SKBr3-luc xenografts were sacrificed at 5, 24, 48, and 72 h after intravenous injection of (111In-DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye800)m, and major organs were dissected. (A) Notched box-and-whisker statistical plots compare TMRs obtained with g-scintillation counting for nuclear counts and <t>NIR</t> fluorescence imaging for optical counts at various time points. There was no statistical significance in TMRs observed at various time points within each imaging modality, but TMRs obtained with optical imaging were statis- tically higher than those obtained with nuclear imaging (P , 0.0001) at each time point. (B) Plots of nuclear versus optical TMRs obtained with nuclear imaging and optical imaging for these mice yielded an R value of 0.9476 (P , 0.0001), suggesting that results obtained from nuclear imaging and optical imaging are highly correlated. (C) When TMRs were compared on a consistent basis with respect to tissue weight (g), the statistical differences between optical and nuclear imaging are abolished.
    Nir Fluorescence Signal, supplied by LI-COR, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nir fluorescence signal/product/LI-COR
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nir fluorescence signal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    nir fluorescence signal recovery of the hsa-capn2  (Signal Recovery)
    90
    Signal Recovery nir fluorescence signal recovery of the hsa-capn2
    FIGURE 5. Athymic mice bearing SKBr3-luc xenografts were sacrificed at 5, 24, 48, and 72 h after intravenous injection of (111In-DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye800)m, and major organs were dissected. (A) Notched box-and-whisker statistical plots compare TMRs obtained with g-scintillation counting for nuclear counts and <t>NIR</t> fluorescence imaging for optical counts at various time points. There was no statistical significance in TMRs observed at various time points within each imaging modality, but TMRs obtained with optical imaging were statis- tically higher than those obtained with nuclear imaging (P , 0.0001) at each time point. (B) Plots of nuclear versus optical TMRs obtained with nuclear imaging and optical imaging for these mice yielded an R value of 0.9476 (P , 0.0001), suggesting that results obtained from nuclear imaging and optical imaging are highly correlated. (C) When TMRs were compared on a consistent basis with respect to tissue weight (g), the statistical differences between optical and nuclear imaging are abolished.
    Nir Fluorescence Signal Recovery Of The Hsa Capn2, supplied by Signal Recovery, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nir fluorescence signal recovery of the hsa-capn2/product/Signal Recovery
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nir fluorescence signal recovery of the hsa-capn2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    nir fluorescence signal recovery  (Signal Recovery)
    90
    Signal Recovery nir fluorescence signal recovery
    FIGURE 5. Athymic mice bearing SKBr3-luc xenografts were sacrificed at 5, 24, 48, and 72 h after intravenous injection of (111In-DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye800)m, and major organs were dissected. (A) Notched box-and-whisker statistical plots compare TMRs obtained with g-scintillation counting for nuclear counts and <t>NIR</t> fluorescence imaging for optical counts at various time points. There was no statistical significance in TMRs observed at various time points within each imaging modality, but TMRs obtained with optical imaging were statis- tically higher than those obtained with nuclear imaging (P , 0.0001) at each time point. (B) Plots of nuclear versus optical TMRs obtained with nuclear imaging and optical imaging for these mice yielded an R value of 0.9476 (P , 0.0001), suggesting that results obtained from nuclear imaging and optical imaging are highly correlated. (C) When TMRs were compared on a consistent basis with respect to tissue weight (g), the statistical differences between optical and nuclear imaging are abolished.
    Nir Fluorescence Signal Recovery, supplied by Signal Recovery, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nir fluorescence signal recovery/product/Signal Recovery
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nir fluorescence signal recovery - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    nir fluorescence signals  (Kodak)
    90
    Kodak nir fluorescence signals
    FIGURE 5. Athymic mice bearing SKBr3-luc xenografts were sacrificed at 5, 24, 48, and 72 h after intravenous injection of (111In-DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye800)m, and major organs were dissected. (A) Notched box-and-whisker statistical plots compare TMRs obtained with g-scintillation counting for nuclear counts and <t>NIR</t> fluorescence imaging for optical counts at various time points. There was no statistical significance in TMRs observed at various time points within each imaging modality, but TMRs obtained with optical imaging were statis- tically higher than those obtained with nuclear imaging (P , 0.0001) at each time point. (B) Plots of nuclear versus optical TMRs obtained with nuclear imaging and optical imaging for these mice yielded an R value of 0.9476 (P , 0.0001), suggesting that results obtained from nuclear imaging and optical imaging are highly correlated. (C) When TMRs were compared on a consistent basis with respect to tissue weight (g), the statistical differences between optical and nuclear imaging are abolished.
    Nir Fluorescence Signals, supplied by Kodak, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nir fluorescence signals/product/Kodak
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nir fluorescence signals - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    FIGURE 5. Athymic mice bearing SKBr3-luc xenografts were sacrificed at 5, 24, 48, and 72 h after intravenous injection of (111In-DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye800)m, and major organs were dissected. (A) Notched box-and-whisker statistical plots compare TMRs obtained with g-scintillation counting for nuclear counts and NIR fluorescence imaging for optical counts at various time points. There was no statistical significance in TMRs observed at various time points within each imaging modality, but TMRs obtained with optical imaging were statis- tically higher than those obtained with nuclear imaging (P , 0.0001) at each time point. (B) Plots of nuclear versus optical TMRs obtained with nuclear imaging and optical imaging for these mice yielded an R value of 0.9476 (P , 0.0001), suggesting that results obtained from nuclear imaging and optical imaging are highly correlated. (C) When TMRs were compared on a consistent basis with respect to tissue weight (g), the statistical differences between optical and nuclear imaging are abolished.

    Journal: Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine

    Article Title: Dual-labeled trastuzumab-based imaging agent for the detection of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression in breast cancer.

    doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.042234

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 5. Athymic mice bearing SKBr3-luc xenografts were sacrificed at 5, 24, 48, and 72 h after intravenous injection of (111In-DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye800)m, and major organs were dissected. (A) Notched box-and-whisker statistical plots compare TMRs obtained with g-scintillation counting for nuclear counts and NIR fluorescence imaging for optical counts at various time points. There was no statistical significance in TMRs observed at various time points within each imaging modality, but TMRs obtained with optical imaging were statis- tically higher than those obtained with nuclear imaging (P , 0.0001) at each time point. (B) Plots of nuclear versus optical TMRs obtained with nuclear imaging and optical imaging for these mice yielded an R value of 0.9476 (P , 0.0001), suggesting that results obtained from nuclear imaging and optical imaging are highly correlated. (C) When TMRs were compared on a consistent basis with respect to tissue weight (g), the statistical differences between optical and nuclear imaging are abolished.

    Article Snippet: Cells were suspended in 100 mL of PBS and added to a microtiter plate, and the NIR fluorescence signal was obtained by use of an Odyssey infrared imaging system (Li-Cor Biosciences).

    Techniques: Injection, Whisker Assay, Imaging, Optical Imaging